Cookie policy: on www.telstudies.org we use analytics cookies to understand how visitors use the site. The anonymous information they provide suggests improvements and alerts us to technical errors. For more information, see our cookies page, which also explains how to block or remove cookies.  Search T. E. Lawrence Studies
Loading

Contents lists



 

T. E. Lawrence to Robert Graves


[mid-October 1924]

These came too late to return with My Head, My Head, and so I took the liberty of laying them aside for second reading, which is just ended, in my cottage, with the Kreutzer sonata going on the gramophone. My Head isn't at its best this morning, owing to my having been in trouble lately (run up for insulting a corporal, and used the company office to purge all the draafe of my mind upon him... a hot and horrible scene, which scared our ladylike O.C. out of his manners. Case dismissed), and because there are more worries to come next week. Court of inquiry.

However. The Presence. Very moving. It reads like a first draft, too charged with passion for its form. The metre isn't common, and does not always fit the thought perfectly. I've underlined two phrases. The first didn't please me: and you repeat it (its grammatical form is what I'm talking about) four lines lower.

Also 'abuse' and 'use' feel as if brought in just to match one another. I may be wrong. They seem like bubbles in the mixture. 'Accusingly enforcing her too sharp identity'. That strikes me as a bit mannered. Bad-mannered, like the Sitwells' over-punctilious ceremony of phrase. Pernickety: Max-beerbombish.

I'd like to transpose some of the opening lines: the 'of whom' etc. down to 'on memory' aren't, intellectually, greater, louder, or in complement of 'dead is gone . . . underground': indeed I fancy they come before it: and I'm old-fashioned in liking my climax last... or in liking the poem to open crescendo and not diminuendo.

This is not to be taken as a denigration of The Presence. The power of the whole comes through its parts... transcends its parts: so that you wonder after having come down that uneven stairway of rhymes, to find yourself possessed of a place entirely new.

On third thoughts I wouldn't alter it. The spontaneity is one of its strengths.

What's the cause that you, and S.S. and I (from the S.S. to the ridiculous!) can't get away from the War? Here are you riddled with thought like any old table-leg with worms: S.S. yawing about like a ship aback: me in the ranks, finding squalor and maltreatment the only permitted existence: what's the matter with us all? It's like the malarial bugs in the blood, coming out months and years after in recurrent attacks. Have you leisure? I'd like to send you the book I tried to write those years ago. S.S. read it, and grew kind to me, afterwards: which was a good comment: and if your mind is now accustomed to living, perhaps you would read it for me.

My motive is the selfish one, of wanting criticism. The margins are blank to write upon in pencil. The print is eye-destroying, the length of the book appalling:... its sincerity, I fancy, absolute, except once where I funked the distinct truth, and wrote it obliquely. I was afraid of saying something, even to myself. The thing was not written for anyone to read. Only as I get further from the strain of that moment, confession seems a relief rather than a risk.

T.E.S.

Note. This letter almost certainly dates from mid-October 1924, since the incident with the corporal is referred to in a letter from Lawrence to Charlotte Shaw of 13 October, see Letters I, p.110.

Source: B:RG 30-31
Checked: jw/
Last revised: 19 February 2006


Copyright, privacy, contact | Cookies help